Evidence quality
Higher-quality inputs carry more weight: customer interviews, completed experiments and dated source links qualify for scoring. Founder context explains what to test, but it is not independent proof.
StartupX AI turns founder context, attached evidence and experiment history into structured findings. It does not prove market demand or guarantee business success.
Higher-quality inputs carry more weight: customer interviews, completed experiments and dated source links qualify for scoring. Founder context explains what to test, but it is not independent proof.
A score is less confident when only a few items support a claim. Small samples can point to a useful next test, but they should not be treated as proof of demand.
Supporting and contradicting evidence are reviewed separately. Contradictions reduce confidence and help identify what needs another interview, source or experiment.
Recent evidence is generally more useful than stale inputs, especially for pricing, competitor positioning and customer acquisition assumptions.
AI-assisted suggestions are treated as generated assessments until a founder links real evidence. If evidence is weak, absent or one-sided, the product shows insufficient evidence and recommends the next validation action instead of presenting a precise conclusion.
number of evidence items linked to the assumption
source quality and attribution
supporting versus contradicting evidence
completed experiment outcomes
missing interviews, public sources or measured results
The result screen includes calculation details and threshold status directly, so founders can see why a dimension is scored or why it remains unassessed.